The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal (6 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment defendant recognized his mistake and reflects it, there is no punishment for the same kind of crime, and that only part of the amount of the fraud of this case can be acquired.

However, the crime of this case was abused the system of pre-paid housing loan for workers who are operated with public funds to stabilize the residence of homeless workers. The nature of the crime is not good by means of means of planned and threatening the foundation of the national welfare system, and the amount of fraud of this case was not recovered from damage to the judgment of the court. There is no special change in circumstances after the sentence of the court below. In full view of the defendant's age, sex, criminal conduct, occupation and environment, motive and circumstance leading to the crime of this case, and all the sentencing conditions as shown in the records and changes theory, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., even if considering the above favorable circumstances favorable to the defendant, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, we cannot accept the defendant's above assertion.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.