logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2016.01.12 2015가단110579
공사대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 121,700,000 as well as 6% per annum from December 28, 2014 to August 10, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

(d) ;

On the other hand, after the above construction contract, on March 2009, the Plaintiff prepared and delivered a written estimate to the Defendant for the “Additional Facility Work, Reinforcement soil Work, Reinforcement and Car tracks, parking lot drainage work, waste, and home reception work” (hereinafter “instant additional work”). The Defendant’s employees D’s position is “D” as indicated by the Defendant’s Defendant’s employees D. On March 27, 2009, the lower part of the additional work except for the parking lot drainage work is KRW 43,000,000, and then signed the Defendant’s corporate seal at the lower part of the said quotation, and then, the Plaintiff signed the agreement with the Defendant’s corporate seal at KRW 25,00,00 as indicated below (2).

(1) * On March 27, 2009, Defendant D (2) recognizing the consultation amount of additional construction costs of KRW 43,000,000, out of the total amount of KRW 105,000,000, the following: (1) In the event of a decision of the original office after the rent, the parking lot drainage Corporation * Defendant D (2) recognizing the consultation amount of additional construction costs of KRW 43,00,000 among the additional construction costs of KRW 105,00.

E. The Plaintiff received KRW 56,800,000 in total in the name of G, one of the co-representatives of the Defendant from January 14, 2009 to September 30, 2009, as indicated below, under the name of the Defendant, and from April 19, 2013 to December 27, 2014, under the name of one of the co-representatives of the Defendant, after performing construction works under each of the instant construction contracts and the instant additional construction works.

B 【Ground of recognition” without any dispute, entry in Gap evidence 1 through 7, and evidence 9 (including the number of pages), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of the determination as to the cause of the claim, the Defendant’s remaining construction cost of KRW 121,700,000 = The instant secondary construction contract of KRW 489,50,000 in the instant case, the third construction contract of KRW 33,00,000 in the instant case.

arrow