logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.08.21 2012가단246930
구상금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 22,940,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from August 10, 2012 to August 21, 2013.

Reasons

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence 1 to Gap evidence 14, and Eul evidence 1 to Eul evidence 5 (including each branch number):

The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into an automobile insurance contract (hereinafter referred to as “Class 1 insurance contract”) with respect to future pipeline Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Spepe”), with respect to the insurance period from October 1, 201 to March 1, 2012, with respect to a vehicle for filing a complaint (hereinafter referred to as the “instant vehicle”). The Defendant is an insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with the Central Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “Central Corporation”) on August 30, 201, with the insurance period from September 1, 201 to September 1, 2012; the representative insured is the Central Corporation and each prime contractor; the maximum amount of compensation per person is KRW 20 million; and the maximum amount of compensation per person is KRW 200,000,000 per accident; and each domestic worker’s accident guarantee insurance contract (hereinafter referred to as “instant insurance contract”).

B. On November 22, 2011, the Central Corporation concluded a construction contract with regard to B apartment management offices and the above apartment outer wall repair and reconstruction works, setting the construction period as KRW 744,490,000 (including surtax) from November 14, 201 to June 15, 2012.

C. On March 8, 2012, C of the instant apartment leased by the Central Government in the future pipeline, D, E, and E, and F, a staff member of the said apartment management office, had been carrying on the wall painting of the instant apartment in the height of approximately 15 meters from the height of 15 meters, during the instant apartment construction, during which the boom boom cost of the instant apartment vehicle was cut to be below the Gap himself and work at the said boom, and died, and F did not fall and suffered injury.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). D.

At the time of the instant accident, the Central Corporation did not provide safety education to workers, such as C, D, E, and F, and the instant case.

arrow