Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 200,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On 14:30 on 27, 2014, the Defendant: (a) spreaded the flaps to the victim D (year 76) in a store with no Seoul C trade name; (b) when the victim and the Si expenses, the Defendant flapsed the victim’s flaps with the fluor and hand, and assaulted the victim’s face twice in drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the police interrogation protocol to D

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defense counsel's assertion on the defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act asserts that the illegality is excluded as it constitutes legitimate self-defense under Article 21 of the Criminal Act, even if the defendant committed an assault against the victim, it is merely limited to the defense source against the victim's assault.

In light of the degree of the assault inflicted on the victim by the defendant recognized by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, the circumstances leading up to the assault and the circumstances at the time, etc., the defendant's act cannot be seen as legitimate self-defense to defend the victim's improper attack.

Therefore, the defense counsel's above assertion is not accepted.