A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On April 21, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for habitual fraud, etc. at the Busan District Court on April 21, 2017, and the execution of the sentence was terminated in the Seongbuk Detention House on April 20, 2018.

The Defendant, “2018 Highest 1726,” even though he did not have a certain occupation and income and did not have any money to pay the drinking value during the number, and did not have an intent or ability to pay the drinking value even if he was provided with alcohol from the victim B, on May 31, 2018, the Defendant ordered beer, etc. while doing so at the main point of “D” in the operation of the victim in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, as if he would pay the drinking value to the victim, and acquired it by receiving from the victim, namely, an alcoholic beverage equivalent to KRW 200,000 at the market price.

The Defendant ordered beer, etc. while doing so at around 01:30 on June 13, 2018, the Defendant was unable to pay the alcohol value even if he was provided with alcohol, etc. from the victim E because there was no certain occupation and income and there was no money to pay the alcohol value during the process. On June 13, 2018, the Defendant ordered beer, etc. to pay the alcohol value to the victim from the main point of “G” in the operation of the victim in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu. In other words, the Defendant acquired the alcohol equivalent to KRW 150,00 at the market price from the victim.

On June 8, 2018, the Defendant, “2018 Highest 1941, the Defendant, at around 03:22 on Jun. 8, 2018, committed the act as if he had no intent or ability to pay the drinking value and would normally pay the drinking value to the victim J (the age of 63). The Defendant ordered the alcohol to the victim J. (the age of 63) and then acquired it from the victim amounting to KRW 200,00 of the market value, such as the beer 20 C, 1, and 6 sing service.

"2018 Highest 1996"

1. On June 1, 2018, the Defendant against the victim K is deemed to have paid the cost of singing room, etc., even if using the said singing room, even though he/she did not have the intent or ability to pay the cost of singing.