beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 40,160,000 for the Plaintiff and its related KRW 6% per annum from July 8, 2014 to August 20, 2015; and (b) August 21, 2015.
Reasons
1. Determination as to the cause of claim
A. A. Around March 2014, the Plaintiff received a request from the Defendant for “project design for a private citizen in South and North Korea,” and completed the design and supplied the design to the Defendant on May 12, 2014. (2) Around April 2014, the Plaintiff was entrusted by the Defendant with “the installation of a private citizen for a private citizen in the Culular Pular Pular Pular Pular Pular.” On June 2, 2014, the Plaintiff completed the private production on June 25, 2014, and completed the said construction work on July 7, 2014.
3) The Plaintiff (excluding value-added tax; hereinafter the same shall apply) KRW 5,000,000 for design services for project design projects by a private person in South and North Korea.
(2) Although the Defendant claimed KRW 40,160,000 in total, including the construction cost of production of a private person in the Cululular Pular Pular Pular Pular Pular Pular Pular Pular Pular Pular Pular Pular Pulos. However, the Defendant did not pay it. [The grounds for recognition include each of the descriptions of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8 (including each number of
B. According to the above facts of recognition, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff 40,160,000 annually from July 8, 2014, which is the day following the completion date of the Plaintiff’s final construction project, to the Defendant from August 20, 2015, to August 20, 2015, 6% per annum prescribed in the Commercial Act, from August 21, 2015, the following day, to September 30, 2015, Article 3(1) of the former Act on Special Cases Concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings, and the main sentence of Article 3(1) of the former Act on Special Cases Concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings (wholly amended by Presidential Decree No. 26553, Sep. 25, 2015) to the Defendant at the rate of 20% per annum as stipulated in the main sentence of Article 3(1) and the main sentence of Article 3(1)5 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings (Presidential Decree No.). 153.
2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.