(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.12.11 2015노999 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.12.11 2015노999

공문서위조등

Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

The seized District Prosecutors' Office No. 130, 2015.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (such as imprisonment and three years and six months) imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case was committed on the part of the neighbors by deceiving victims by sending letters to the name of the president and the chief of the secretary, the chief of the secretary, the Prime Minister, and other high-ranking public officials. The defendant committed the crime of this case, which was committed repeatedly over a period of one year and six months, was committed in consideration of the following: (a) the criminal act was committed repeatedly over a period of one year and six months; (b) the method of the crime was extremely poor; (c) the fraud was committed by the victim was committed by forging and uttering various official documents, such as the personnel record card to prove it; (d) the key and Cheongyangyang; (e) the presidential insignia, etc. entered into; or (e) the election of the President and the Prime Minister; or (e) the audit plaque; or (e) the crime of this case was committed by deceiving victims by deceiving them in the name of the president and the chief of the secretary; and (e) the criminal act was committed against the victim A, which was partially poor; (e) even if the victim acquired money was partially returned to the victim A; and (c) the Defendant did not yet did not recover.

However, in full view of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, including the fact that the defendant recognized all of the crimes in this case and reflects the depth of each of the crimes, that the defendant is the first offender who has no criminal punishment power, that the defendant agreed with the victim R, and that the defendant returned 40,200,000 won, which is part of the victim AA's damage amount, and all of the sentencing conditions as shown in the argument in this case, such as the defendant's age, family relation, criminal record, relationship, character and conduct, environment, means and method of the crime, motive and circumstance of the crime, etc., the punishment sentenced by the court below is somewhat unreasonable.

3...

유사 판례

-서울행정법원 2015.9.24. 선고 2015구합7807 판결

-서울행정법원 2016.12.27. 선고 2016구합4850 판결

-대전지방법원 천안지원 2018.1.18. 선고 2017고단1930 판결

-대구지방법원 2017.02.09 2016가합2677

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.11.3.선고 2015고단4013 판결