The Defendants are not guilty. The Defendants are not guilty. The summary of each judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

1. Determination on the acceptance of bribe by Defendant A and the acceptance of bribe by Defendant B

A. The summary of the facts charged 1) Defendant A’s bribery H Facility Management Corporation (hereinafter “Corporation”) is a public corporation established by making full investments in the H market in order to contribute to the promotion of citizens’ convenience and welfare by efficiently managing and operating facilities designated by the H market based on the local public enterprise law and the Ordinance on the Establishment of the H Facility Management Corporation based on the Ordinance on the establishment of the Public Enterprise Act and the H., and thus, Defendant A’s performance of cleaning, such as collection, transportation, and disposal of wastes, and cleaning of street and surface in the H Si area by concluding the above and the entrustment agreement on cleaning, but from around 2005, the cleaning of the facility management corporation’s agency was gradually converted into a private cleaning service company.

On November 1, 2014, the Defendant took office as the president of the H market and takes overall charge of the overall operation of the H, including cleaning services in most areas in the H market. A person deemed a public official in the application of bribery under Article 83 of the Act of a local public enterprise, who is in charge of cleaning services in the H market and the Si of H taking overall charge of the overall operation of the H market. A person who cooperates with or assists in business affairs with the HI Environmental Project Agency, environmental facilities, etc., and who is deemed a public official in the application of bribery under Article 83 of the Act.

On December 2, 2014, the Defendant prepared for the operation of cleaning service companies in the office of the president of the Corporation located in JJ.

B received a request from Dongin to receive cleaning services from H, and received a reward of KRW 5 million in cash from K under its pretext, and received KRW 10 million in cash from the above B in the coffee shop, “L” located in K on February 2, 2015.

Accordingly, the defendant accepted a bribe in relation to his duties.

2) The Defendant offering a bribe in Defendant B made a solicitation to the said A at the date, time, and place specified in the foregoing paragraph (1) under the name of the honorarium.