logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2016.04.25 2016고단161
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 26, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a crime of violating road traffic laws (drinking driving) from the original Chuncheon District Court's original branch on October 26, 2007, and a summary order of KRW 2 million for the same crime in the same court on August 20, 2010, respectively.

The defendant is also engaged in driving a car on the bandon.

On December 12, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol level of 0.169% from blood alcohol level on 19:35 on December 12, 2015, while driving it, and driving the two-lane road in front of the “DMoel” located in Seoul in the prime city of nuclear power along the two-lanes from the surface of the shooting distance of the chemical distance to the surface of the width of the width.

Defendant 1 performed a internship in a place where U.S. is not permitted in a state where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of alcohol as above, and was driven by the victim E (40 tax) driving the first lane of the said road on the F, which was driven by the victim E (40).

As a result, the Defendant got at the victim E and the victim G (53 Do, 40 years old), victim H (40 years old), and victim I (41 Do, respectively, with approximately three weeks of medical treatment. At the same time, the Defendant got at the scood and tensions of the scood body in need of medical treatment, and at the same time, did not immediately stop the cood vehicle so that the scood vehicle is damaged to cover approximately 685,465 won of repair cost, and runs the vehicle under the influence of alcohol, notwithstanding the fact that there was a history of punishment for violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Each statement of G, H and I;

1. Reports on traffic accidents, and reports on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. Each written diagnosis and written estimate;

1. Notification of the results of regulating the driving of drinking alcohol and a statement in the circumstances of the driver of drinking alcohol;

1. Each photograph;

1. Previous convictions: Criminal history records and investigation reports (a summary order related to the same criminal suspect's past records).

arrow