logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 2019.12.20 2018나26221
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship 1) The E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”)

A) A company is established on July 16, 1993, and is engaged in the manufacture and sale of Gta, various kinds of tyres and rubber products consignment business. Defendant C acquired the entire shares of E around April 1995. Defendant C, a co-born employee of Defendant C, was assigned to the representative director of E on October 26, 1996 and has been engaged in the management of E with Defendant C. 2) F Co., Ltd (hereinafter referred to as “F,” and, when called together with E, “related company” was a subsidiary of H Co., Ltd., which is the primary company engaging in the manufacture and sale of tyres and Gta.

The Defendants and I (the Defendant’s birth) acquired F from H Co., Ltd. around October 2005, and Defendant B took office as the representative director on November 3, 2005, and Defendant C was appointed as the director on the same day, and the I was appointed as the representative director on April 1, 2012, and managed F.

3) The Plaintiff is a person who had worked as a factory of E from the time of the establishment of E to the end of 2000 where the Defendants acquired and managed E. B. Establishment of D and ownership 1) the Plaintiff and the Defendants established D on January 9, 2001, and D produced and sold rubber necessary to make others board vehicles (hereinafter “raw materials of this case”), and the Plaintiff, who had been engaged for a long time in the rubber product manufacturing business, had the representative director take charge of the rubber product manufacturing business.

2) At the time of the establishment of D, the shareholders and equity shares were 20%, c60%, and J 20%, and the Plaintiff acquired 20% shares of J. Defendant C sold its shares to F and held 40% and F 60% at the present time. (c) The Plaintiff was appointed as the representative director of Defendant B and the Plaintiff’s representative director, and the Plaintiff’s resignation 1) appointed as the representative director after the establishment of D and managed D. Defendant B was appointed as the representative director on March 15, 2007. Defendant C was appointed as the representative director on the same day, and was involved in D’s management on the same day, and retired from the representative director on March 20, 208.

2 Defendant B and Defendant C shall be on March 15, 2007.

arrow