logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2017.09.14 2016고단710
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

[Defendant A]

1. The punishment of the defendant shall be determined by six months;

2.Provided, That this ruling shall not be later than two years from the date on which it became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a business owner who operates a general game providing business in the name of "F Game Center" on the Ministry of Strategy and Finance E and 1st, and Defendant B served as an employee in the above game site.

No one shall distribute or use game water, the contents of which are different from those classified by the Game Water Management Committee, provide such information for the use thereof, or display such information for such purposes, and shall exchange, arrange exchange, or repurchase such tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game water as a business.

1. On February 20, 2016, from around 19:30 to March 19:30, 2016, Defendant A installed a game machine with a content different from that of the game water classified by the Game Water Management Committee, such as “F Game site” with a separate score indicated on the top of the Scocoon, and a separate score was generated in Scocoon with the appearance of background animation, and offered it to customers who use the same.

2. The Defendants’ joint crime committed the following acts: (a) around February 20, 2016 to March 19:30, 2016; (b) Defendant A informed Defendant B of the time of exchange to customers; (c) ordered Defendant B to exchange out of the game room; and (d) Defendant B, according to the instructions given by A, was in charge of providing KRW 9,000,000, excluding KRW 10,000,000, which is a money exchange commission, to customers, who suffered from the species indicated with the points obtained through the “sack game” game. In short, the Defendants conspired with the game room and exchanged the intangible results obtained through the use of the game product to customers, who did not want to find the game room.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer in relation to G or H;

1. I.O.T.

arrow