logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.09.04 2015나641
물품대금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On the last day of the month in which goods were supplied to the Defendant, the Plaintiff, who is a construction materials retailer, supplied goods worth KRW 10,278,960 in total, as indicated in the following table:

Although the Defendant asserts that there was no supply of the goods listed in the above table Nos. 1 and 2, the same amount as the supply price of February 28, 2013 was deposited into the Plaintiff account. In full view of the fact that the same amount as the supply price of April 30, 2013 was deposited into the Plaintiff account, and that the Defendant confirmed that the Defendant supplied the goods, such as a general flat, at the Defendant’s construction site as indicated in the above table Nos. 1 and 2, including Nos. 1 and 2, the supply of the goods can be sufficiently recognized.

On or before February 25, 2013, the supply value of the items 1.1. 480 1,080 1,000 x 640 x 1,440 x 320 x 7,000 x 736,00 x 70 x 300 x 8,000 x 1,000 x 636,00 x 8,000 x 60 : 36,000 : 8,00 : 6,000 ; 6,000 ; 6,00 ; 6,00 7,00 x 8,00 x 1,00 x 1,50 x 1,50 x 6,00 x 8,07 x 6,015 x 8,208 x 6,2013

B. The Defendant deposited 8,808,335 won in total to the Plaintiff as indicated in the following table:

Deposit amount of 1,080,00 won on the deposit date of February 28, 2013, 30.1,440,000 won on April 30, 2013, 30.1,415,775 won on August 31, 2013, 4,872,560 won on the deposit date of 4, 2013 (based on recognition: Each entry (including each number, and oral argument) in subparagraphs 1 through 4.

arrow