logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.12.16 2013고정1896
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 11:50 on March 13, 2012, the Defendant driven a BM3 car without a car driver’s license from the front side of the BM3 car in the Dong-gu, Busan Metropolitan City to the front side of the main body in the Dong-gu, Busan Metropolitan City from approximately 200 meters away from the BM3 car without a car driver’s license.

2. As described in the above paragraph 1 above, the Defendant driving the said car, and driving the way in front of the main body in the Dong-dong, Busan Metropolitan City, along the opposite side of the main body in the Dong-dong, along the one-lane between the three-lanes.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to ensure the necessary distance to avoid a collision with the motor vehicle ahead and to prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive a vehicle in the vicinity of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the latter.

After all, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the sponse of the sponse to both sides of the sponse that require two weeks of medical treatment to the said victim and the knife E (V, 56 years of age) who was aboard the said victim and the knife driver’s vehicle

3. When the Defendant committed the act as referred to in the above paragraph 2, the Defendant destroyed the property equivalent to KRW 475,108, such as vehicle repair cost, such as the replacement of a vehicle behind the victim’s vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. C’s traffic accident statement;

1. The actual survey report on traffic accidents;

1. A written diagnosis and written estimate;

1. The ledger of driver's licenses;

1. Application of the statutes governing traffic accident-related photographs;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso of Article 3(2)7 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the Road Traffic Act.

arrow