logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.02.03 2016고단89
근로기준법위반등
Text

All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is the representative director of C Co., Ltd. in the South west-gun B, who ordinarily employs four workers and operates the manufacturing business. The Defendant did not pay KRW 1,200,000 wages and retirement allowances of KRW 3,03,950 for October 12, 2013 to October 30, 2014 to retired workers D without any agreement on the extension of the payment period between the parties.

2. Of the facts charged in the instant case, the unpaid amount of wages is a crime falling under Articles 109(1) and 36 of the Labor Standards Act, and pursuant to Article 109(2) of the Labor Standards Act, the unpaid amount of retirement benefits is a crime falling under Article 44 subparag. 1 of the Act on the Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefits, and thus, cannot be prosecuted against each victim’s express intent under the proviso of Article 44 of the Act on the Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefits.

According to the records, D may recognize the withdrawal of his/her wish to punish the defendant on December 17, 2015, which was after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow