The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the original court (six months of imprisonment) shall be too vague and unfair.

2. Although there are favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant appears to reflect the instant crime, that there was an agreement with the victim, that there was negligence on the part of the victim, the degree of the instant assault and the result of the bodily injury, that the Defendant’s violent crime was committed nine times, and that the Defendant’s violent crime was committed one time, and that the Defendant committed the instant crime during the same kind of repeated crime, and that the Defendant committed the instant crime during the same repeated crime period, and that the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court against the Defendant is too unreasonable in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the circumstances after the crime.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.