logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.03.22 2015고합646
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(강제추행)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 7, 2015, the Defendant: (a) reported the victim D (V, 17 years of age) at the entrance of the apartment of the wife population C at the same time, and (b) committed an indecent act by force on the part of the victim, on November 7, 2015, at the same time at the entrance of the apartment of the wife population C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Article 7 (3) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse and Article 298 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances in favor of the defendant among the grounds for sentencing);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (this shall be repeatedly considered as above);

1. Where a conviction of a sexual assault offender subject to registration of personal information under the main sentence of Article 21(2) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse becomes final and conclusive, the defendant is a person subject to registration of personal information pursuant to Article 42(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes and is obligated to submit personal information to the competent agency pursuant to Article 43 of the same Act.

There are special circumstances in which personal information shall not be disclosed, as provided for in the exception of disclosure order and disclosure order and notification order.

The issue of whether a case constitutes “a case to be determined” ought to be determined by comprehensively taking into account the Defendant’s age, occupation, risk of recidivism, characteristics of the offender, such as the type, motive, process of the relevant crime, consequence, seriousness of the crime, etc., the degree of disadvantage and anticipated side effects of the Defendant’s entrance due to an disclosure order or notification order, the preventive effects and effects of the sexual crime subject to registration that may be achieved therefrom, and the effects of the protection of the victim from the sexual crime subject to registration (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2011Do14676, Jan. 27, 2012).

arrow