logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.02.03 2015가단5307473
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Defendant C: (a) KRW 4,000,000 to Plaintiff A; and (b) KRW 3,000,000 to Plaintiff B; and (c) from January 12, 2016 to February 3, 2017.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission, upon reporting inferior foods, shall refer the details of the report to the competent department, including the competent Gu office, and the competent department shall conduct a verification by reference to the details of the report, and if the report is verified based on the data of the report and the results of the verification, the agency issued a penalty surcharge at the Gu office, and then notified the details of the disposition to the Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission, the Anti

B. From February 6, 2015 to February 21, 2015, the Plaintiffs visited to the food sales business office located in the 19th place, including DNA, operated by Defendant C.

C. Defendant C submitted to the subordinate police station, etc. a written petition of urge the Plaintiffs to investigate by larceny, three persons, etc.

On the other hand, persons related to the Marart Federation, including Defendant C, provided CCTV video data by informing the media and broadcasting companies of the same purport.

Defendant Chosun Shipbuilding Co., Ltd., Ltd., the Korean Broadcasting System, the cultural broadcasting company, the EsBS, and EsBN Co., Ltd., respectively (hereinafter “each of the reports of this case”).

E. On April 28, 2015, Plaintiff B received a disposition of non-prosecution on charges of theft, such as theft of money posters, etc. which were displayed at the display stand, from the Sungnam Branch of the Suwon District Prosecutors’ Office. On November 30, 2015, Plaintiff A habitually intrudes on the structure managed by the victims, such as habitually entering the 19 place food retail business office, etc. for criminal purposes, and interfered with the duties of the store administrators by hindering the adequacy of normal burial services, etc., and by making a false report, it interferes with the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint residence), interference with duties, and obstruction of the performance of official duties by a deceptive scheme.

arrow