beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine of 12,00,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 700,000 won.
The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a person who operates a sexual traffic business establishment by leasing Nos. 405, 504, and 607 in the member-gu Ftel in Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, and Defendant B is a female employee employed by Defendant A and engaged in sexual traffic.
1. No one shall engage in sexual traffic or arrange to engage in sexual traffic in return for giving, receiving, or promising to give, any money, valuables, or other economic benefits to an unspecified person, in violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. of Defendants A;
Nevertheless, around April 20, 2015, the Defendant received 150,000 won as the price for commercial sex acts from the customers in front of the fourth floor of the Ftel, and provided guidance to the same officetel 504, which had them leased in advance for the purpose of commercial sex acts. In addition, the Defendant: (a) ordered female employees B to engage in commercial sex acts with the customers after mathing under the above 504; (b) from November 29, 2014 to April 8, 2015, the control date of the instant case, thereby arranging commercial sex acts.
2. Violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. by Defendant B;
A. On April 7, 2015, around 20:30, the Defendant received KRW 504,00 from the above Ftel and 100,000,000 from A, and the name of “G” was unknown and sexual intercourse was made with one customer with which the name of “G” was unknown.
B. On April 7, 2015, around 21:30, the Defendant: (a) received KRW 504 of the Ftel from A; (b) sought KRW 100,000 from A; and (c) made a sex relationship with one customer with which the name of “G” was unknown.
C. On April 8, 2015, around 00:0, the Defendant received KRW 504,00 from the above Ftel and received KRW 100,000 from A, and the name of “G” was unknown, and sexual intercourse was between one customer and one customer whose name is unknown.
Accordingly, the defendant committed sexual traffic.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Protocol of seizure, list of seizures, day immediately before control ( April 7, 2015), business account books, business account books as of April 8, 2015, lease agreement No. 607, lease agreement No. 405, and lease agreement;