1. The defendant is against the plaintiffs:

(a) Of the second floors of the building listed in attached Form 1, each point of Attached Form 5, 2, 6, 7, and 5 shall be indicated in Attached Form 2.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On 199, the Plaintiffs concluded a lease agreement with the Defendant by setting a deposit amount of KRW 20,00,000, monthly rent of KRW 1,70,000, KRW 220,000, KRW 220,000, KRW 220,000, and KRW 220,000, and period of KRW 5,220,000 among the two floors of the instant building (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

The Defendant paid deposit of KRW 20,000,000 to the Plaintiffs, and operated the DV bank in the name of “D” at the instant store.

B. Around August 2001, the Plaintiffs leased a store on the same floor as the instant store to a person who operates a VD store, and around July 2002, leased the front store of the instant store to a person who operates the main store.

As the Defendant alleged that the sales have decreased due to competition establishments on the same floor, and the main points thereof are slick and low, thereby hindering business, the Plaintiffs, who are the Plaintiffs, has been reduced to KRW 1,200,000 on November 25, 200, and KRW 700,000 on November 25, 2005, respectively, have implicitly renewed the instant lease agreement with the Defendant.

C. Around October 9, 2009, the Plaintiffs notified the Defendant that the instant lease contract will be terminated on the grounds of the delinquency in rent. On November 2009, the Defendant sent to the Plaintiffs a letter of answer stating that “A defect in the settlement of rent and income” would constitute a problem of tax evasion by the Plaintiffs on rent income.

Around November 2010, the Defendant’s husband E, representing the Defendant, demanded that the Defendant’s husband F of Plaintiff A, representing the Plaintiffs, “F, after five years, exempt the Plaintiff from the rent until the time when the store of this case is to be transferred,” and F, upon the completion of the statute of limitations on tax liability, was known to the Defendant’s demand that the Defendant: (a) 5 years have passed since the completion of the statute of limitations on tax liability; (b)

The answer was made after 5 years ago, "Sadora".

[Ground of recognition] dispute.