beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. The plaintiff's summary of claim of this case
A. The Plaintiff is a company running metal structure, window construction business, etc., and the Defendant, as the vice head of the Plaintiff’s construction division from September 201 to March 2013, as the Plaintiff’s vice head, worked as the field agent at the site of the entry capital construction site at E-university underground level D, E-university underground, which was scheduled to be newly built in Kim Jeju-si, as the Plaintiff’s vice head of the construction division at Kim Jong-si.
B. On April 17, 2012, the Defendant: (a) decided to build an apartment building of 490 households in Gimcheon-si; (b) decided to contact the relevant parties so that the Plaintiff may receive a contract; and (c) decided to first allow a new apartment to use the Plaintiff’s corporate card; and (d) ordered the Plaintiff to use the Plaintiff’s corporate card; (b) based on the creative and glass construction cost of KRW 22 million.
However, despite the commencement of the construction of the above new apartment, the construction of the new apartment as a result of the confirmation by the Defendant that the contract for the construction of the new apartment was not entered into, and the construction of the new apartment became no longer possible for the Plaintiff to take charge of the construction of the new apartment as well as the construction of the new apartment as a result of the verification by the Defendant.
C. In addition, around November 2012, the Defendant, as an on-site manager at the site of the Plaintiff’s establishment of the E University underground tea located in Yan-gu, Jeonju-si, the Plaintiff performed, as an on-site manager at the site of the Plaintiff’s establishment of an access capital, was lost after having been kept in the open room at the school playground that does not have any management of at least 2,909,70 won at the market price.
As above, the Defendant, as a worker, violated the Plaintiff’s duty to provide labor, or breached the duty of due care of a good manager, shall be given the Plaintiff an opportunity to receive KRW 22 million of the model right and glass price of the newly-built apartment.