The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The gist of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person engaged in crop cultivation in Sejong Special Self-Governing City D.

On March 19, 2017, the Defendant laid the rice straw straw in the instant rice straw, while working to spread straw in the rice field located in E around 10:00.

Since there are many crops and grasss, in such cases, a person engaged in crops cultivation has a duty of care to make him/her not spread to another place where he/she remains before leaving the above discussion.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and caused six plastic houses owned by the victim H in F andG, which are located in F andG, to be put to six greenhouses.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, destroyed 15,103,50 won of repair costs due to removal expenses, personnel expenses, etc. of the 6 entrances of the plastic greenhouse, which is a structure owned by the victim.

2. There is evidence that is consistent with the facts charged in the judgment, I’s investigative agency and legal statement are made, and the contents were postponed in the discussion (E) of the J management around March 19, 2017, and at the time, the defendant was engaged in spraying fertilizers in the above E issues, and at around 1:30 p.m. on the same day, the victim’s issues (the above FF andG) were not made.

수사보고( 참고인 K 전화통화) 의 내용은, 당일 의용 소방대 총무부장인 K이 피고 인과 통화를 하였는데 피고인이 L의 논( 위 E)에서 불을 피웠는데 다 껐다고

I stated that it was.

On the other hand, J did not have any straw in the court where the defendant performed the spraying of fertilizers in the above E case, and there was no rice straw to the extent that it would interfere with the spraying of fertilizers at the time, and the defendant left the above E case, and she was able to write the straw at her place after he left the above E case.

was stated.

In addition, during the litigation of this case, the victim expressed his intention not to punish the defendant.