logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.04.23 2014고단492
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 2012, 2012, the Defendant: (a) at the office of “D”, a household production and export company of the victim C’s operation in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (Seoul), the Defendant said that the victim would be liable for the use of the victim’s goods upon importation. The victim’s share of money that can be immediately commercialized upon importation. If the Defendant borrowed KRW 33,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, including profits, would be returned after 40 days.

However, in fact, there was an uncertain situation in which the import of bamboo from Japan and domestic markets were uncertain, and the Defendant was urgently needed with funds to make investments in the Doz manufacturers. Therefore, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim in terms of the price for the purchase of bamboo, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the principal and profits to the victim after importing and disposing of the bamboo within the agreed time limit.

On December 12, 2012, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; and (b) transferred KRW 33,00,000 to the Korean bank account held by the Defendant’s mother-friendly E on December 12, 2012.

2. Embezzlement;

A. A. On November 23, 2012, the embezzlement Defendant: (a) on November 23, 2012 at an infinite place; (b) on the part of the victim, (c) on the part of the victim, the victim, i.e., paragraph (1), (d) of this Article, had the victim directly delivered the victim F and G with the Handbaging cost, and (d) had the victim received a total of KRW 6,240,00 from the victim and stored the said amount for the victim; and

B. On July 2013, 2013, while embezzlement Defendant was unable to repay the borrowed money as referred to in paragraph (1) around January 2013, 2013, the Defendant, as the victim, such as the preceding paragraph, was to take over H, which would cause the Defendant to carry on the business as a franchise, on the ground that he/she would take over she without the mold, and the victim recommended him/her to import she. On March 2013, 2013, the Defendant imported she was to keep she was on the second floor of the instant H.

(b).

arrow