Defendant shall be punished by a fine of eight million won.

If the defendant does not pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On April 17, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on April 25, 2015 due to a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a group, deadly weapon, etc.) in the Gwangju District Court’s net support on April 17, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 25, 2015, and was still in the current suspended sentence. On October 8, 2012, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 5 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking) and violated the prohibition of violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking) more than twice by receiving a summary order of KRW 5 million as the same crime at the same court on December 3, 2014.

[Criminal facts] On October 4, 2015, the Defendant driven D Spoter spoke-spoke in the state of alcohol concentration of about 0.092% while under the influence of alcohol while under the influence of alcohol at about 500 meters, without obtaining a driver’s license, from the front and front of the ancient-do, which is in the Spoch-dong of Spoch-dong around 05:20.

Summary of Evidence

Before the Defendant’s legal statement statement report, report on the driver’s statement, and previous records of the judgment on the ledger of driver’s license: In response to inquiries such as criminal history, investigation report (a sentence attached to a judgment and a copy of a summary order), Articles 148-2(1)1, 44(1)(a) and 152 subparag. 1, and 43(a) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the criminal facts subject to the applicable Acts and subordinate statutes, the Defendant was subject to a fine under Articles 40 and 50(a) of the same Act for the ordinary concurrent crimes under Articles 152 subparag. 1 and 43(a) of the same Act, the Defendant was subject to a fine under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for a period of suspension of the execution of the sentence, and the Defendant was subject to a fine under Article 334(1) of the Act on the Litigation of Provisional Payment Order.

However, while the defendant works as an environmental U.S. source, he is responsible for the livelihood of his mother and three children.