logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.09.20 2016고단1215
전자금융거래법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Except as otherwise expressly provided for in any other Act, no person shall transfer any access medium or lend or borrow any access medium while requiring or promising to receive the price therefor in using or managing the access medium.

On April 28, 2016, the Defendant was offered a proposal to offer KRW 3 million to a person who is an employee of B Company B to remove a motor vehicle under the name of a person who is an employee of B Company B.

At around 15:00 on May 3, 2016, the Defendant sent the personal bank account D's e-mail card to the nameless person via Kwikset service, and notified the account number and account password by telephone.

As a result, the Defendant promised to pay for, lent access media used in electronic financial transactions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written petition;

1. Report on internal investigation (Attachment of a warrant of search and seizure verification attached and telephone communications with the nominal owner of a bankbook);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to replys to a financial warrant (including details of transactions for entry and withdrawal);

1. Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 (3) 2 of the Act on the Electronic Financial Transactions in the relevant Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (or choice of imprisonment);

1. Each consideration shall be taken into account the fact that the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act does not have the same criminal records and reflects the same criminal records, and that there is no actual benefit amount.

arrow