logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.12.17 2014가합7144
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B shall be 405,180,000 won and the interest rate of 15% per annum from January 20, 2015 to the date of full payment.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition [based on recognition: Fact that there is no dispute, entry of evidence A No. 1, significant fact in this court, the purport of all pleadings];

A. Defendants B, C, D, and Non-Party F were working for the Plaintiff’s subcontractor and the Plaintiff’s subcontractor, and knew that a large amount of surplus paints (which is over the distribution period, or over the ingredients, or remaining ones) were incurred in the production process of paint, and were charged with intent to steal the commission by using the Plaintiff’s employee’s transfer certificate that it is possible to take them out to the outside. Such surplus rent is stored in the Plaintiff’s integrated material warehouse located in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, and was contained in the cans of 15 liter capacity (hereinafter “instant paint”).

(2) On April 16, 2012, Defendant B and C: (a) contacted the Plaintiff’s integrated materials warehouse; and (b) operated the truck by communicating the Defendant E, a funeral service provider, to enter the said site; and (c) Defendant C received a certificate of removal from the company as if it were normally carried out of the company, and thereby stolen the instant paint 70 cans of the instant truck, carrying it out of the said truck, and carrying it out of the said warehouse.

Defendant B and C stolen the instant paint 460 cans owned by the Plaintiff on five occasions from April 16, 2012 to June 7, 2012 by the said method.

(3) On June 25, 2012, Defendant B and F contacted the Plaintiff’s integrated material storage; Defendant B and F called “F with paints; and F used the instant paint 10, which was kept in custody as the said warehouse by driving a truck, to carry the truck on the truck and carry it out of the company, and then bring the above paint to Defendant E. The Defendant B and F stolen it by using the aforementioned method 50 times in total from June 25, 2012 to June 27, 2013 (hereinafter “the instant paint 2,129”) (hereinafter “the instant paint 2”).

(4) Defendant B and D are the Plaintiff’s integrated materials storage around April 20, 2013.

arrow