Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a member of the police officer who is a violent organization that is engaged in activities centered on the Bapo-si Mapo-si, the distance of the Hapo-si, and the peace plaza.

On July 27, 2017, around 04:15, at the top of the G convenience store located in Sinpo City F, on the ground that the Defendant misleads the Defendant’s H white franchise vehicle into the victim I (31 tax) with the vehicle of this branch, and caused the Defendant to have caused the said franchise vehicle one time as a drinking for the lower seat of the driver’s seat of the said passenger vehicle.

Although the Defendant demanded the victim to take a bath, the victim was able to take a behavior to see the Defendant on his part, and the victim was boomed to the floor, and then the victim was able to go up with the victim's bridge, and then boomed the victim's neck between the defendant's winter and the victim's neck. When the victim's face and breath, the victim was able to take care of about two weeks, and the victim was able to take care of the victim's face and breath by drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. On July 25, 2016, the Defendant, who is the cause of violence in sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, was sentenced to two years of imprisonment by the Gwangju High Court for a crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (organization and activities of organizations, etc.) at the Gwangju High Court on July 25, 2016, and committed the instant crime even during the period of repeated offense upon termination of the execution of the said sentence on October 8, 2016.

However, the crime of this case occurred in the course of dispute by the injured party as the cause of the defendant's vehicle-friendly relationship, and the defendant does not first pay the trial expenses to the injured party, but the injured party does not want the punishment against the defendant by agreement with the injured party.

(2).