All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the reasoning of the judgment below in light of the records, it is justifiable to reverse the judgment of the court of first instance which found Defendant A, B, C, and D guilty on the grounds that there is no proof of crime on the facts charged against Defendant A, B, C, and D, and to find the

In so doing, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the crime of defamation by expressing false facts and the crime of interference

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment on the grounds of Defendant E’s appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court’s determination that Defendant E was guilty on the grounds indicated in its reasoning is justifiable.

In so doing, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the crime of defamation by expressing false facts and the crime of interference

3. All appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.