logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2013.05.23 2013고단151
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On January 24, 1994, around 00:25 on January 24, 1994, the Defendant, as the owner of A truck, violated the restriction on operation by loading more than 12 tons of freight on the 2nd nives of the nives of the nives of Jinyang-gun, Jinyang National Highway 2, Ginyang-gun.

2. The judgment prosecutor applied Article 86 and Article 84 subparagraph 1 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995) to a public action, and the sentence of 100,000 won by a fine for summary order No. 94 high-ranking266, Apr. 15, 1994 became final and conclusive, but Article 86 of the above Act provides that "if an agent, employee, or other employee of a corporation commits a violation under subparagraph 1 of Article 84 in connection with the business of the corporation, a fine under the corresponding Article shall also be imposed on the corporation, as well, becomes retroactively null and void by the Constitutional Court Order No. 2011Hun-Ga24, Dec. 29, 2011.

Therefore, the facts charged in this case constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow