The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The facts that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects his depth, etc. are favorable to the defendant, or that the defendant again left to the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that he had been punished several times of criminal acts in the same kind, and that the defendant's blood alcohol content is considerably high by 0.125%, and that the Road Traffic Act requires strict punishment due to an act inherent in the risk of causing damage not to be known to the general public. In full view of other various circumstances, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., and the circumstances after the crime, etc., which form the conditions for the arguments and the sentencing specified in the records of this case, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.