logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2020.05.21 2019고단2640
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 30, 2019, around 00:05, the Defendant received 112 report that there was domestic violence in the Defendant’s residence of the Defendant of the Mayang-gu building C, Ansan-gu, the Defendant was subject to removal from E and F, who was dispatched to the site.

The Defendant, while impairing the above police officers, committed assaulting the E and F’s bridge to get a home with the Defendant’s wife and the E and F to get a home.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. On-site photographs and photographs of damaged parts by police officers;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order [the scope of the punishment by law] The sentencing criteria is applied from KRW 50,00 to KRW 10,000,00 (Application of the sentencing guidelines], so the criminal liability for the crime of this case in which violence is used to police officers performing official duties of KRW 2,00,000,000, not the sentencing guidelines [decision of sentence] is somewhat weak. Although the defendant has several times of violence, the defendant recognized the facts charged in this court, and the defendant committed the crime of this case by contingently against police officers dispatched in the married couple's fighting, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., are considered as the conditions for the sentencing specified in the argument of this case.

arrow