logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.08.24 2015나2068704
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff H's claim expanded by this court is dismissed.

3. The appeal costs.

Reasons

1. The reasons why this court should explain are the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for addition or dismissal as follows, and thus, they are quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 2 11 and 14 Da 11 and 14 Hah Hah Hah Hah 7 Hah Hah 6, and 7 Hah 8 Hah Hah 14 Hah Hah 7 Hah 8 Hah Hah 8 Hah Hah 14 Hah 2, 201 Hah 2 through 4 Hah Hah 9 Hah Hah Hah Hah Hah 2, 201 Hah Hah Hah Hah Hah 2, 201 Hah Hah 5 Hah Hah Hah Hah Hah Hah 2, 201 Hah Hah Hah Hah 2, 201 Hah Hah Hah 2, 205 Hah Hah Hah 1, 2011

In actual clinical trials, considering the need for 6-12 hours to increase the frequency of luminous test under consideration of various circumstances, and 6-12 hours to increase the effect of luminous therapy, it is time for the medical personnel of the defendant hospital to test the number of luminous intensity to the plaintiff A at 7-9 hours from May 6, 201 to the next day, to increase the number of luminous lines, to conduct intensive luminous treatment, and to observe the state of luminous.

arrow