logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.09.22 2016고단1002
특수절도미수등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence 1 through 5 shall be confiscated from the accused.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 25, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny and two years of suspension of execution, and on February 21, 2013, the Jeju District Court sentenced six months of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny at the Jeju District Court on February 21, 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 22, 201, the sentence of suspension of execution became null and void, and on December 24, 2013, the Defendant was released on December 24, 2013 and the parole period expired on March 4, 2014.

1. Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint residence intrusion) (2016 Height group 1853), along with C, the Defendant: (a) was aware of theft of property; (b) entered the victim’s name in Ulsan-gu D’s house on May 26, 2015; and (c) was discovered to the victim F’s house located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; and (b) the Defendant attempted to put the drber, which was prepared in advance before the front door of the front door of the front door entering the front door inside the house, and attempted to put the drick in the front door of the front door of the front door entering the front door inside the house, but was trying to open the window by putting the drick in the space cresh of the window, and was flying to the victim F in the house.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the residence of victims jointly with C.

2. Special larceny attempted (2016 highest 1002), the Defendant, upon intrusion into an apartment with C, has gathered to steals another’s property, and around May 10, 2016, when the Defendant came to the house of the victim H on May 10, 2016, G apartment G 202 Dong 1502 Dong, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Gapo-si, Kimpo-si, Gapo-si, 202, the Defendant reported the network from the stairs outside of the entrance, and C did not find any property, but in fact, after opening the door in an influence and ruping the inside.

As a result, the defendant tried to steal another's property in collaboration with C, but did not achieve that intention, but did not commit an attempted crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A suspect interrogation protocol prepared by each public prosecutor with regard to C (a record 1853, 17, 2016 high group);

1. Each police statement protocol with H and F ( Appendix 7, 1002, group 2016, group 7, group 7.

arrow