Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 16:30 on March 25, 2015, the Defendant: (a) left a vehicle at the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul apartment 105-dong parking lot, the Defendant: (b) laid down the vehicle after parking the vehicle in front of the 105-dong 105-dong, and shocked even the door of the vehicle number E-car owned by the victim D; (c) faced the victim’s breath with the breath in a dub, breath, and boomed the vehicle parked behind the pushed, and caused the victim’s injury, such as the sprink, sprink, salt, etc., for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and F;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the argument is that the defendant and his defense counsel first tried not to put the defendant's fat at a fat where the defendant was fatd with fat, and the defendant was satd against and fatd on his fat at his own vehicle, and used the same type of force as stated in the facts charged, even if the defendant did not do so.

Even if there is no causal relationship between the defendant's act and the victim's injury, or the victim's self-defense does not constitute a crime.

2. The judgment was examined, the victim D consistently and specifically stated from the police to this court about the defendant's act, the content of damage, and the situation before and after the crime. The statement was made without any increase or decrease in the contents unfavorable to the defendant, such as where there is no particular rationality in the contents of the statement, and where he first made a statement without any increase or decrease in the contents unfavorable to him, such as the fact that he saw the head of fat, etc., the witness F is present as witness in this court and the defendant and the victim are underground parking lots.