The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. No person charged with the instant case shall reveal any false fact openly through an information and communications network with intent to defame another person, thereby impairing the honor of another person;

On October 25, 2017, at around 07:56, the Defendant visited “D”, a website, using a computer at the Defendant’s residence located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, 2009 Dong 2002, the Defendant: (a) did not have any fact that the victim E, the head of the apartment management office, intended to embezzled management expenses under the pretext of the cost of damping the underground parking lot; (b) on the said car page bulletin board, the Defendant purchased it at the management office after he/she reported to the company of the underground parking lot construction in the said car page.

What is the bill of expenditure was confirmed, and it was confirmed that the construction company deposited in August, and it was shown to be the sense that the chief of the management office intends to escape.

” 라는 허위 내용의 글을 게시하고, 같은 날 09:33 경 위 글의 댓 글 창에 “ 제 습기부분 소장이 빼먹으려고 꼼수네요.

Some months have the honor to find any kind of law which does not know, and makes it possible to take it back.

In this case, the occupation groups in Korea will be able to do so.

It is true that if the deposited forces do not find out the deposited forces and do not do so within the inside, they are in line with the proper expenditure and take them away at an appropriate time. It is also the warden's sense that the representative is unable to find it out.

“Written comments on the false content” were posted.

Accordingly, the defendant abused the victim's reputation by disclosing false information through information and communications networks with a view to slandering the victim.

2. The charged facts of this case are crimes falling under Article 70(2) of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc., and the charged facts of this case may be prosecuted against the victim’s will specifically manifested pursuant to Article 70(3) of the same Act.