The defendant's KRW 15,00,000 for the plaintiff and its 5% per annum from October 11, 2019 to October 22, 2020 for the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff and the non-party C are legally married couple who completed the marriage report on June 5, 1985, and have one of their children who became adults.

B. C came to know of the Defendant around May 2018, and began teaching system from June 2018.

At the time, C was mainly living in the region, but it was introduced that he was living together with one child in the state of divorce, and the defendant was living alone with one woman who became adult at the time.

After the Defendant and C commenced teaching system, they moved in China on July 21, 2018 to a new mixed tour commemorative, and began to live in full scale, and C had been living together for more than two days a week due to the relationship between the port at the time and the port at the time.

C. Around February 21, 2019, the Plaintiff became aware of the fact that C had living together with the Defendant and committed an unlawful act. Around the same month and around the 24th day of the same month, the Plaintiff demanded the Defendant to suspend the relationship with C by text messages, but C and the Defendant continued to maintain an unlawful relationship.

At the time when C was discovered to the Plaintiff the illegal relationship with the Defendant, C did not proceed to divorce due to the fact that “A was unable to proceed to divorce,” and notified the Defendant that the relationship will continue to exist, and strongly rejected the decision with the Defendant, the Defendant continued to engage in the wrongful relationship with C even though C was aware that it was the father and son.

However, for a long time, the defendant notified C of the different opinions to C, and did not do so, and C, around April 25, 2019, while living with the defendant on the last day of October 2018, which donated to C, around the end of October 2018, that it would be used to take over the high flagpole located in the D, Cheongju-si, the amount of KRW 30,000,000, which was loaned to the defendant, and the lawsuit requiring the payment of the objection was eventually interrupted by the Seoul Central District Court 2019Da12840, and eventually, the illegal relationship between the defendant and C was interrupted around that time.

On the other hand, the plaintiff is C.