The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: S employed as a juvenile upon the wind to present his/her identification card; at the time of the first criminal conduct as indicated in the judgment of the court below, S considered as not a juvenile; at the time of the second criminal conduct as stated in the judgment of the court below, Eul et al., who was an adult and seven other persons, entered the above restaurant, and entered the restaurant, and thereafter three persons, such as F et al., were able to enter the restaurant, and three persons, including F et al., were able to enter the restaurant, and three persons, such as F et al., were considered to have been able to enter the restaurant, and three persons including F et al. were considered to have been ordered to do so. The court below found him/her guilty of all the facts charged in this case, which affected the conclusion of the judgment, although the defendant did not intend to sell alcohol to juveniles and had no intention to sell it at the time of second criminal conduct as stated in the judgment of the court below.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the following facts are acknowledged: (i) E, G, H, I, J, K, L, L, and M, which had been a customer at the “D” restaurant operated by the defendant at the time of the first crime as indicated in the judgment of the court below, are stated in the court below that both the defendant and the employee did not verify the identification card; and (ii) N,O also submitted a statement to the same purport at the investigative agency; (iii) at the court of the court of the court of the court below, G initially confirmed the identification card at first, but did not confirm the identification card; and (iv) I did not confirm whether it was a juvenile at the above restaurant at the court of the court of the court below, but did not confirm whether it was a juvenile at the above restaurant prior to work at the above restaurant; and (v) M also did not make a statement at the court of the court of the court below to the court of the court below that it stated that it was a criminal suspect.