Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On July 10, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 22:30, on the front side of the Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu 20-ro 20-gil 28, Mapo Art Center; (b) took a bath on the ground that C and D were replaced by the Defendant; (c) took a bath on the ground that C and D were replaced by the Defendant; and (d) took a bath, embling, and threatening C and C, upon wearing her uniform, filed a report on the said facts with G police officers, such as the Assistant F, belonging to the Seoul Mapo-gu Mapo Police Station Ear who patroled C

around 22:50 on the same day, the Defendant returned to a place where F and G listen to a factual relationship from C in the front of the Mapo Art Center, and “p” refers to the NIS staff;

Cp. Doz.

“I n n n n n n n n n n n n n, F and G n n n n n n n with the Defendant;

In light of the Chewing Chewing theory, C 1st smuggling and F and G tried to verify the identity of the Defendant, but the Defendant refused to arrest the Defendant as an offender in the act of assault, thereby committing assaulting the Defendant, such as cutting off the G’s shoulder at one time, cutting off the shoulder, cutting down the knife, cutting off the knife, and cutting off the F’s chest on the floor, when F demanded the confirmation of re-identification while suppressing the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's criminal investigation and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of each statutory statement statute of witness F, G, and C;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Taking into account the fact that there was no result of injury to police officers who have suffered from reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and that there was no criminal conviction against the defendant.