The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal by the defendant;

A. From January 15, 2013 to January 25, 2013, when the mother of the victim of mistake of facts did not work, the Defendant did not commit an indecent act against the victim as provided in Articles 3 through 8 of the lower judgment.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant (two years and six months of imprisonment, 40 hours of order to complete a program, and 5 years of disclosure and notification) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court’s lawfully adopted and investigated evidence, namely, ① the victim was subject to the first indecent act from the Defendant on the second week of January 2013, the victim committed an indecent act on his own daily on the third week of January, 201, ④ the victim committed an indecent act on his own on the fourth week and fifth week, and last indecent act on his own on February 8, 2013, and the last indecent act was committed on his own on the last day of the year before the day of the year, and specifically explained the number of times and date of the damage, the opportunity for memory, etc. ② the victim was 15 years old at the time of the instant case and 16 days after the date of the last damage, the victim was accused of the Defendant’s indecent act on his clothes, and the mother was able to be confused with the victim on the date and time of his appearance, and the mother was able to be confused with the victim on the part of the victim.