A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

The seized Switzerland knife knife (29cm in total length, 17cm in length, f.o.

Punishment of the crime

At around 02:00 on April 24, 2018, the Defendant: (a) sought food blades (the total length: 29cm; : 17cm) which are dangerous things in the house on the ground that the victim D, who lives on the upper floor of the apartment house in Asan-si B apartment house C, could not easily lock music, and (b) sought as the house of the above D, and threatened the victim E (64 years) with the victim E (the victim) who did not lock the house through the entrance without the locking station, d) “I am fluencing this weather,” and “I am hh h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the victim D's residence, and threatened the victim with dangerous things.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of intrusion upon residence), Articles 284 and 283(1) (the point of special intimidation) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, Article 50, and the proviso to Article 42 of the same Act for the increase of concurrent crimes;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act include the confession and rebuttal of each of the crimes in this case; the Defendant, who had been under stress due to noise problems in the upper floor where the victim D resides, was drunk at the time of the instant crime; the Defendant agreed with the victim E of the instant special intimidation; on the other hand, in light of the content and risk of each of the crimes in this case, the crime is not less severe; the Defendant has the history of being subject to multiple punishment due to violent crimes; the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspended sentence due to intimidation and interference with duties on April 1, 2017, and was sentenced to two months of suspended sentence due to intimidation and interference with duties; and the Defendant committed each of the crimes in this case without being subject to suspended sentence, even if the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 1, 2017, and all other circumstances revealed in the records of this case and the change theory, shall be determined as the sentence as per the Disposition.