Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around February 8, 2017, the Defendant assaulted the victim D (Woo, 21 years old) who was aware of his/her reputation on the front day of Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul (Seoul) on February 23:5, 2017, on the ground that he/she had taken an examination against the Defendant against his/her female-child group, on the ground that he/she had taken an examination against the Defendant, on the part of his/her hand, on the part of the victim, at one time.

2. On February 8, 2017, the Defendant, a police officer, etc., who was sent to the scene after receiving a report of 112 at the place indicated in paragraph (1) at around 23:58, which is a place where persons who are unspecified pedestrians walk, and sent out to the site after receiving a report, separate the Defendant D from the Defendant, and while listening to the circumstances of the case, the Defendant issued a penalty Stick against those who throw away cigarette on the floor.

In the end, the victim was openly insultingd by referring to the so-called “the year to be Chewing by being aware of” and “the day to be Chewing.”

3. The Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties at the time, at the place specified in paragraph (2) at the time, and at the above place, assaulted the police officer’s left hand hand over one week, which the said police officer saw as a mobile phone on the ground that he taken the cell phone by taking the cell phone on the ground that he taken the cell phone.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the handling of victims' photographs, on-site photographs and CCTV photographs, and 112 reported cases;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence), Article 311 of the Criminal Act (the point of insult), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act, which increases concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter “Criminal Procedure Act”) recognizes and reflects the Defendant’s mistake.

The accused is a mentally handicapped person.

In this case.