logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.02.20 2013고단5193
사기
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is a person who acquired the Hong Kong permanent residence right after departure from Hong Kong around 1994 and operates the “E” in the name of “E” in the name of “E” in the name of “E”, and the victim G from October 201 to the Hong Kong sales company.

From March 4, 2011 to April, 2011, the Defendant came to know of the victim who started finding the victim as a customer in E. Around that time, the Defendant had been aware of the job place to operate another restaurant, and the Defendant tried to conduct a business by reporting the victim to become a well-known funeral and investing in H to start a new business, and the fact that the victim was the victim did not intend to do so even though he did not intend to transfer his business share, but did not intend to do so to do so, the Defendant saw the victim to run the business with H in turn, and then requested the money as the H partner, H business loan funds, E business-related partners, and the H damage compensation money and received the money by fraud.

1. On July 201, 201, the Defendant: (a) stated that “the Defendant shall enter into an early contract with the victim as soon as he/she had set up a good place in the E-cafeteria; (b) would not take the victim’s right away from any other person who has to enter into the contract; (c) would make a monthly profit of 40 million won and recover all the investment money within one year; and (d) would jointly make a joint investment in 50:50 and jointly distribute the profit; and (e) said, the Defendant’s opening of H business would have made a false statement from the victim under the name of H partner money.

9. During the period of 15.15., the Defendant’s transfer of USD 720,000 in the Hong Kong BEA Eastern Bank and the HSBC bank account (the equivalent of KRW 108,000 in Korea), and the Hong Kong USD 50,000 in September 15, 201 (the equivalent of USD 22,50,000 in Korea), and on September 25, 2011, the Hong Kong USD 1,000 in cash (the equivalent of USD 19,50,000 in Korea) was received from the victim at each E-cafeteria, and acquired from the victim in cash the sum of USD 1,00,00 in Hong Kong (the equivalent of USD 150,000 in Korea).

2. On October 21, 201, the Defendant borrowed money from the victim, even though he did not intend to repay it, the Defendant’s name and seal H’s opening of business.

arrow