logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.11.03 2015가단114568
보험에관한 소송
Text

1. The Plaintiff’s obligation to pay the lending charges due to the Plaintiff’s traffic accident on November 26, 2014 to the Defendant is KRW 583,050.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person who entered into a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance contract with respect to the vehicle C (hereinafter “victim”) from November 1, 2014 to November 1, 2015 with respect to the insurance period as to the vehicle C (hereinafter “the instant vehicle”), and the Defendant is the owner of the Dolman Syman Syman Syman Syman (hereinafter “the instant damaged vehicle”).

B. At around 19:05 on November 26, 2014, E contacted the back wheel of the damaged vehicle of this case, which was parked in the signal signal line with the front right edge of the instant sea vehicle, while driving the instant sea vehicle in the vicinity of the Yongdub Station in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). C.

Due to the instant accident, the back wheels of the damaged vehicle in this case is a small blicker.

(See Attached Photographs): A1-6.

2. Determination

A. (1) The plaintiff's assertion (1) although the degree of damage of the damaged vehicle caused by the accident of this case was extremely minor and there was no hindrance to the operation of the damaged vehicle of this case, the defendant sought 6.4 million won for the loan of this case to the plaintiff after using the same damaged vehicle as the damaged vehicle of this case after the accident of this case. Considering the degree of damage of the damaged vehicle of this case, the repair work of this case takes a repair period of about a day. The daily loan cost of the damaged vehicle of this case is ordinarily 173,50 won (=267,000 won x 0.65). Thus, the obligation to pay the rent of this case to the defendant of the plaintiff to the defendant of this case shall not exceed the above 173,550 won.

(2) From December 1, 2014 to January 19, 2015, the Defendant failed to use the instant damaged vehicle during the said repair period. In order to conduct the F club activities, the Defendant is identical to the instant damaged vehicle.

arrow