beta
Text
Defendant
C All appeals against the Defendants by the Prosecutor and the Prosecutor are dismissed.
The judgment of the court below is against the law.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. The sentence imposed by the lower court (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, additional collection of 30 million won) is too unreasonable.
B. Each sentence sentenced by the lower court to the Defendants (Defendant A: 10 months of imprisonment; 2 years of suspended sentence; 10,400,000 won additional collection; 2 years of suspended sentence; 2 years of suspended sentence; 3 years of confiscation; 3: Defendant D; 10 months of suspended sentence; 2 years of suspended sentence; 3 years of additional collection; 15 million won; 70,000 won of each fine), Defendant E, and F) are too uneasible.
2. Determination
A. The defendant C and the prosecutor's unfair argument about the above defendant's unfair judgment on the sentencing of the defendant C and the prosecutor together with each unfair argument on the sentencing of the defendant C and the prosecutor, and the act of arranging sexual traffic, such as the crime of this case, is not so serious that it is necessary to be strict because of its social prejudice, such as impairing the sound sexual culture and good morals. The above defendant's allegation is without merit since it is an unfavorable aspect, such as the fact that the defendant employed foreign women who do not have the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities and commits the crime of this case. The above defendant recognized all the facts charged in this case, and reflects his mistake. The above defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, etc. are considered in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, such as the above defendant's age, sexual intercourse, family relationship, etc., and thus, it is not recognized that the court's punishment is too heavy or unreasonable.
B. The prosecutor's act of arranging sexual traffic, such as the crime of this case, to judge the defendant A, B, D, E, and F, is not so likely to cause social harm, such as undermining the sound sexual culture and good morals, and the crime of this case is recognized as having been committed in an organized manner, while the defendant A, B, D, E, and F all of the charges of this case are recognized.