1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Defendant, on May 29, 2012, subcontracted the crypt construction work among the construction work of Gwangju apartment to the Eastern Team Co., Ltd. (the trade name before the alteration: the East Marine Co., Ltd.; hereinafter referred to as the “Dongcheon Team”).

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Eul 1, and the purport of the whole pleading

2. As to the claim for construction price

A. While the Plaintiff’s assertion was re-subcontracted from the Easternern Team to re-subcontract and implement the installation work, on October 20, 2013, the Plaintiff concluded a contract with C and D of the construction division, the Defendant’s site manager and D of the construction division, with the Defendant’s site, with the Defendant’s oral construction work: (a) dancing work, (b) reconstruction work, and (c) reconstruction of damaged re-contains while re-routing the strings; and (b) the construction work, with the outside entrance dancing and real strings in total, KRW 27,720,00,00.

B. The evidence presented and used by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to prove that the Plaintiff agreed to receive KRW 27,720,000 as the price for the construction claimed with the Defendant. Thus, the Plaintiff’s above assertion is without merit.

3. As to the claim for the amount of takeover

A. On September 23, 2015, the Plaintiff’s assertion Eastern Team transferred the Plaintiff’s claim for construction cost against the Defendant with respect to the construction work of re-construction work, the dancing construction work of the lebane pumps, and the installation of the ebs even ebs.g., the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendant, and notified the Defendant thereof.

B. The evidence presented and used by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to prove that the Eastern Team agreed to receive KRW 27,720,000 as the price for the said construction as claimed by the Plaintiff between the Defendant and the Defendant, so the Plaintiff’s above assertion is without merit.

4. According to the conclusion, each of the claims of this case by the Plaintiff is without merit.