1. On April 10, 2014, the Defendant filed a claim for revocation of the disposition of refusal to re-election between the Plaintiff and the Intervenor joining the Defendant (2014-48).

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is a school foundation that establishes and operates the Egrative Women’s University (hereinafter “instant University”), and the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter “Supplementary Intervenor”) is a person whose appointment contract was terminated on February 28, 2014 on the ground that the term of contract expires on the ground that the Plaintiff worked as an assistant professor of the instant University according to the appointment contract with the Plaintiff.

On March 1, 2012, the Plaintiff appointed the Intervenor as a faculty member of the foreign language lecture belonging to the University B, with a fixed term of one year on March 1, 2012. On March 1, 2013, the Plaintiff re-appointed the Intervenor as an assistant for a fixed term of one year.

B. On October 30, 2013, the Intervenor filed an application for reappointment with the Plaintiff, but on December 27, 2013, the Intervenor filed an appeal seeking revocation of the rejection of reappointment with the Defendant on January 27, 2014.

C. On April 10, 2014, the Defendant rendered a decision citing the Intervenor’s claim for the examination of the petition, which was served on the Plaintiff on April 11, 2014.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”) D.

On July 4, 2014, the Plaintiff appealed to the instant disposition and filed the instant lawsuit.

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, entries in Gap evidence 1 through 3, purport of whole pleadings]

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion assistant intervenor did not comply with the Plaintiff’s act of entering the students’ lecture in English on the Internet SNS (Internet Networking Service) and gathering the students. In B, he did not participate in the workshop that had been conducted for the teachers affiliated with the Plaintiff, and delivered to the teachers affiliated with the Plaintiff matters that must be necessarily observed when granting a field work, but did not comply with it, and left Korea without obtaining the president’s permission.

The teachers personnel committee of the University of this case shall take into account all the aforementioned behaviors of the Intervenor.