All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant (the factual errors and unfair sentencing) 1 had a misunderstanding of facts as to the special intimidation at the time and place indicated in the facts charged, but this is merely a defrisoning the body of the Defendant by unfreshing him, and there was no intentional defrisoning the body of the Defendant, and since the Defendant did not have a defrison disease, the Defendant did not carry a defrison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-frison-fris-fris-fris-f-f.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court is too uneasible and unfair.

2. Determination

A. In addition to the circumstances stated in the judgment of the court below as to the Defendant’s assertion of mistake of facts, considering the following circumstances recognized in the record, the Defendant’s use of a shouldered sicker’s disease, which is a dangerous object, can be recognized as having threatened the victim H as stated in the judgment of the court below, so the Defendant’

① At the time of the instant case, the Defendant asserted that the body was freshed with a defreshed with a defresh with a defresh with a defresh with a defresh with a defresh with a defresh with a fresh with a fresh with a fresh with a fresh with a

However, according to CCTV images that are recorded before and after the instant case, at the time.