The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (eight months of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is based on the following facts: (a) the Defendant was sentenced to five times each time to be punished as a crime of violating the Traffic Act on January 5, 2012; (b) even if he was sentenced to two years each due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act on January 5, 2012, the Defendant again was sentenced to six months each time during the suspension of execution and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 13, 2012; and (c) on September 30, 2013 after the parole on July 30, 2013 during the execution of the sentence, the period of parole was too excessive and constitutes a repeated crime; (d) the Defendant was under the influence of drinking while drunk on September 149, 201; and (e) the Defendant appears not to have been able to comply with the Act; and (e) the Defendant, at the time of the instant crime, did not appear to have taken into account all the circumstances, such as drinking and drinking.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.