logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.03.24 2017고정51
부정수표단속법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, as the representative director of C, concluded a check contract from August 26, 2010, under the name of the branch office of the Sung-dong branch office and C in the Sung-dong branch office of the Bank and C, and traded over the check.

On February 2, 2016, the Defendant issued two copies of the check per Korean bank account of the Co., Ltd., Ltd., Co., Ltd., Ltd., located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, with the check number “E”, “10,000,00 won”, “10,000 won”, “F”, “40,000 won”, and “3,000 won” and “3,00,000 won” as the date of issuance, and presented two copies of the check account account of the Korean bank account of the Co., Ltd., Ltd., located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and offered payment on August 23, 2016 during the period of presentation, but did not receive the disposition of suspension of transaction.

2. Determination

A. Article 2(4) of the Illegal Number of Check Control Act: The case in which the person who issued or prepared a check collects the check or the check holder is not prosecuted in the event that the check holder is not punished; and each check holder's non-compliance with the punishment of the check holder is submitted on March 9, 2017, which is after the prosecution of this case.

(b) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow