Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaged in driving CEX car.

Around 09:10 on July 29, 2012, the Defendant was driving the said car and proceeded with the reputation tunnel, which was in the middle of the Gyeonggi Pyeong-gun, in a two-way square plane, at a two-way square plane, with the idea of driving ahead of the vehicle that was driven on the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle. On the part adjacent to the Defendant’s running direction, the victim D, who was in the normal course of driving along the vehicle, was faced with the center line in order to drive ahead of the vehicle that was driven on the front side of the Defendant’s running, and suffered approximately three weeks from the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle and the front part of the E-observer car that was driven by the victim D, who was in the normal course of driving the said vehicle, for approximately eight weeks to the victim F, who is the passenger of the damaged vehicle, the victim was in need of treatment at the left side of the said vehicle, and the victim was in need of treatment at the same time at the same time at the same time 2nd week.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the accused in the first protocol of trial;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., “the grounds for suspended sentence”)

1. Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on Probation, Etc. provides that the defendant has been punished by a fine of the same kind for the reason of sentencing, but the degree of injury to the victims is not less than that of the victims, the confession of the defendant and his reflects on the crime, and the vehicle operated by the defendant is comprehensive insurance.