Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Criminal facts

On May 9, 2017, the Defendant driven a rocketing car at around 08:25 around 08:00, and, at the time of Briju, the Defendant continued to run a cafeteria in front of D in the front of the city of Briju, from the rigate of the city of Briju to the cafeteria.

At the same time, there was a situation where the vision was not secured and a red-off was installed on the front bank, and thus, the defendant had a duty of care to temporarily stop at the intersection and prevent the accident by properly examining the front, rear and left.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was driven by the victim E, who was on the part of the radio wave guards located in the mountain area at the time of breath by negligence without any negligence and without any temporary suspension of red on-and-off signals, who had been driven by the victim E, who was on the part of the Postal Information Center.

FK7 Vehicle's front right part of the Defendant vehicle was received as the front left part of the Defendant vehicle's front left part, and caused the victim to suffer injury, such as an injury to the upper part of the upper part in the upper part in need of approximately seven weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Reports on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act - The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act - The victim and the victim have consistently agreed that the vehicle is covered by a comprehensive insurance and the circumstances for the accident, etc. are considered.